Ian Hickson wrote:
>
> As I see it, so long as there over 50 or so bugs with a [Hixie-P1] to
> [Hixie-P4] mark, that's enough to keep people busy for a couple of weeks,
> so I haven't been rushing to add my markers anywhere. (There's 113 so
> marked bugs at the moment.)
Are people taking any notice of you? :-)
> Note: I have not been looking at Mail, News, IRC, IPv6, P3P, SSL, HTTP
> Digest Auth and related RFCs, IMAP and POP, the various multipart/*
> formats, data:, XBL or XUL very closely. I've been mailing focussing on
Does anyone disagree with:
IRC, IPv6, P3P: no hard targets (only "don't break forwards
compatibility") for Mozilla 1.0.
Perhaps we need to make a list of technologies (acronyms) and get module
owners to approximately estimate, given their current levels of resource,
time to compliance. Then we can see where the problem areas are, and see
if we can shift resources, downgrade the requirements, or do other helpful
stuff.
> XBL bugs have a [xbl1.0] marker that indicates the bugs that Hyatt thinks
> should be fixed by Mozilla 1.0.
There are 16 of these. All but two are Futured or targetted past Mozilla
1.0. One is "back out XBL".
Gerv
