On Sun, 24 Jun 2001, Gervase Markham wrote:
>
> This is a short, unofficial document aimed at starting a discussion to
> define more clearly the requirements for Mozilla 1.0. [...]
>
> Standards Support
> -----------------
> We should stick to what we promised - world-beating support for DOM0,
> DOM1, HTML4 and CSS1.
I've been working on this by labelling what I consider "Mozilla 1.0
blockers" with [Hixie-P1] to [Hixie-P4] in the status whiteboard. (Three
other "Hixie" markers exist, namely [Hixie-P5], "would be nice but we can
cut it for 1.0", [Hixie-PF], "forget it", and [Hixie-B], "I'll buy you
dinner if you fix this").
161 open bugs have the string "[Hixie-P" in their status whiteboard at the
moment (49 are P5 or PF). There are about another 4000 open standards
compliance bugs.
As I see it, so long as there over 50 or so bugs with a [Hixie-P1] to
[Hixie-P4] mark, that's enough to keep people busy for a couple of weeks,
so I haven't been rushing to add my markers anywhere. (There's 113 so
marked bugs at the moment.)
Note: I have not been looking at Mail, News, IRC, IPv6, P3P, SSL, HTTP
Digest Auth and related RFCs, IMAP and POP, the various multipart/*
formats, data:, XBL or XUL very closely. I've been mailing focussing on
CSS, XML and HTML. There are maybe two or three RFEs, crashers or not-
quite-standards-compliance bugs that are marked with the Hixie-Pn marker,
they are those that I really think are important! :-)
XBL bugs have a [xbl1.0] marker that indicates the bugs that Hyatt thinks
should be fixed by Mozilla 1.0.
--
Ian Hickson )\ _. - ._.) fL
Netscape, Standards Compliance QA /. `- ' ( `--'
+1 650 937 6593 `- , ) - > ) \
irc.mozilla.org:Hixie _________________________ (.' \) (.' -' __________
