"ahmed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in
9lv7r3$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9lv7r3$[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 21 Aug 2001:
> i don't know guys.. but;; i was thinking of it in the nn4.x way, as
> in each element's acts as a document.
>
> so yes i see now how it works,, i just find it annowing.. i mean
> what if i don't want to specify any z-index for container elements
> but i want elements that are in them to be z-indexed among each
> other,,,
>
> i won't argue any more i just prefer the ie way, now don't start
> screaming at me spec stuff, i mean the w3c's pecs are not the words
> of god and are changeble,, So if i had it my way i would get it
> done the ie way..
The W3C's specs are about as Word of God as it can get, dude. And if
you want to know something funny, here you go. Those specifications
that IE isn't following that every other browser is, Microsoft helped
write those standards. Microsoft is a major part of the W3C, and as
little of the standard as they choose to incorporate into their
browsers, they help write all of them. How sad is it for them to
intentionally not follow standards that they have helped to write? How
pathetic would it be for the United States to help the UN write a new
polution law, or any kind of law or agreement, and then intentionally
choose to ignore it?
--
ICQ: 123728792
AIM: FlyersR1 9
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_ = m
