Wow wow guys,, g it was only a Q,,
I call it the mozilla way and ie way because they have 2 different
methods,..
and people stop being paranoid.. I'm totally pro Mozilla!
I'm discussing the validity of the w3c's choice!,, hey the spec is made FOR
developers, to help make the net a better place! and since I am a developer,
I think I have the right an opinion,...
Now, I don't care who does what in the w3c, I just think the way ie does the
z-index thing makes more sense, maybe mozilla should point it out to the
w3c(does mozilla have a place there or is it Netscape?) hey its like the
innerHTML thing, its an IE developed spec, w3c doesn't have it, But mozilla
adopted it because they thought its the right thing to do, AND the w3c
(after recommendation from ms/and I think NS)is going to adopt it..
Now what's the big mistake I did, when saying that I like(me a web
developer) the way ie lays out z-index?
hope the clarifies things!
"ahmed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
9lt1ci$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9lt1ci$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> does mozilla have trouble with z-index?
>
> look at the following 2 images, IE5.5 displayes it as it should, notice
that
> the show effect is given by a second layer with z-index=0 and the main
layer
> has a z-index of 1, BUT they are both contained in one layer who's z-index
> is unspecified like all the rest of the elements in the document.body
> node...
>
> it seems that mozilla seperates the main layer from its shado and insert
the
> other submenus in the middle, which in no way should happen, since the
main
> div and its shadow are both contained in 1 seperate div.
>
> thanks
>
>
>
