On 14/09/2001 at 00:56 Ben Bucksch wrote: >Simon P. Lucy wrote: > >>the GPL effectively removes the original >>copyright (insofar as original copyright holders have rights to any >>derivable product) and gives it away to all and sundry. >> >>The MPL, and a few other licences avoids this imposition. >> >Does the MPL give the original copyright holder rights to derived >products? In which way? Yes because the MPL allows the derivatives to be combined with closed source, the originator is never locked out of their own code, no matter what use they wish to put it to. Other than messing with the copyright of subsequent contributors of course. Simon
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Daniel Veditz
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Ian Hickson
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Ben Bucksch
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Daniel Veditz
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Daniel Veditz
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Ian Hickson
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Mitchell Baker
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Ben Bucksch
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Ian Hickson
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Ben Bucksch
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Frank Hecker
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Stuart Ballard
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Ian Hickson
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Ben Bucksch
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Ian Hickson
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Ben Bucksch
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Daniel Veditz
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Ben Bucksch
