Ian Hickson wrote: >(Hmm. They could also declare that MPL version 3 is "Netscape may modify >this code and distribute it without giving away the source". That would be >rather unfortunate, wouldn't it.) > Indeed. That's why I don't suggest to use the MPL as-is. I modifed it for my new files to include the "Initial Contributor" (i.e., myself) as the only one being allowed to change the license. (Not that I would distrust the current people at Netscape, but more the owner of Netscape, namely AOL.) >My bad, I missed the "not" in your sentence. > NP. :-) Good to have cleared that.
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Ben Bucksch
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Ian Hickson
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Ben Bucksch
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Frank Hecker
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Stuart Ballard
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Ian Hickson
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Ben Bucksch
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Ian Hickson
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Ben Bucksch
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Daniel Veditz
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Ben Bucksch
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Gervase Markham
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Simon P. Lucy
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Ben Bucksch
- Re: Licensing Statistics (2001-09-08) Gervase Markham
