Ben Bucksch wrote: > Matthew Thomas wrote: > >> Nonsense. I shouldn't have to switch to a non-free browser just because >> I am one of those millions of users who switches between the Web and >> e-mail (or instant messaging) frequently, and who uses a display which >> is too small for a decently-sized biff icon in any place not covered by >> browser windows. > > > Web and email are completely different applications (which just happen + ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > to be both provided by Mozilla). Switching between them is a task of the > OS, not Mozilla. Oooh good. This should mean that if the browser crashes then the email client (depending on how bad the crash is) will stay perfectly functional - correct? And the same should be true for the browser if the email client crashes - correct? TTFN D.
- Re: Mailnews future plans Oliver Thylmann
- Re: Mailnews future plans Scott Putterman
- Re: Mailnews future plans Mark Hammond
- Re: Mailnews future plans Oliver Thylmann
- Re: Mailnews future plans Scott Putterman
- Re: Mailnews future plans Oliver Thylmann
- Re: Mailnews future plans Matthew Thomas
- Re: Mailnews future plans Ben Bucksch
- Re: Mailnews future plans Matthew Thomas
- Re: Mailnews future plans Ben Bucksch
- Re: Mailnews future plans David Murray
- Re: Mailnews future plans Ben Bucksch
- Re: Mailnews future plans David Murray
- Re: Mailnews future plans Matthew Thomas
- Re: Mailnews future plans Ben Bucksch
- Re: Mailnews future plans Hans-Peter Fischer
- Re: Mailnews future plans Ben Bucksch
- Re: Mailnews future plans Ben Bucksch
- Re: Mailnews future plans Hans-Peter Fischer
- Re: Mailnews future plans Ben Bucksch
- Re: Mailnews future plans David Murray
