Ben Bucksch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb in im Newsbeitrag: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > You have a point only if users are on dialups paid by time. (This user > group is constantly decreasing - it'd guess, by today, the majority of > users is permanently connected.) This may be true for the posters to this newsgroup, since most of them will probably be from the US, but I'm quite sure that the majority of users *worldwide* has a dial-up connection for which they pay by time. (Which also means that a news reader that doesn't support offline reading will be pretty useless for them. This is a feature that *really* matters - apart from stability and performance of course.) Hans-Peter
- Re: Mailnews future plans Oliver Thylmann
- Re: Mailnews future plans Matthew Thomas
- Re: Mailnews future plans Ben Bucksch
- Re: Mailnews future plans Matthew Thomas
- Re: Mailnews future plans Ben Bucksch
- Re: Mailnews future plans David Murray
- Re: Mailnews future plans Ben Bucksch
- Re: Mailnews future plans David Murray
- Re: Mailnews future plans Matthew Thomas
- Re: Mailnews future plans Ben Bucksch
- Re: Mailnews future plans Hans-Peter Fischer
- Re: Mailnews future plans Ben Bucksch
- Re: Mailnews future plans Ben Bucksch
- Re: Mailnews future plans Hans-Peter Fischer
- Re: Mailnews future plans Ben Bucksch
- Re: Mailnews future plans David Murray
- Re: Mailnews future plans Ben Bucksch
- Re: Mailnews future plans David Murray
- Re: Mailnews future plans David Murray
- Re: Mailnews future plans Matthew Thomas
- Re: Mailnews future plans michael
