Jennifer Glick wrote: >... > Mac and Windows currently work the opposite. "Reply" sends to the > newsgroup. "Reply All" sends to the newsgroup and the author. Is > that acceptable? Seems fine to me -- except for a slight danger that the user may come to think of `Reply' as `the usual thing', and `Reply to All' as `the other thing', which will result in them occasionlly sending e-mail replies to mailing list messages when they meant to reply to the mailing list as a whole. But that mistake would be much less embarrassing than doing the opposite. -- Matthew `mpt' Thomas, Mozilla user interface QA Mozilla UI decisions made within 48 hours, or the next one is free
- Reply vs. Reply All for Newsgroups Ben Bucksch
- Re: Reply vs. Reply All for Newsgroups Ben Bucksch
- Re: Reply vs. Reply All for Newsgroups J.B. Moreno
- Re: Reply vs. Reply All for Newsgroups Christopher Jahn
- Re: Reply vs. Reply All for Newsgroups Steve Carroll
- Re: Reply vs. Reply All for Newsgroups Christopher Jahn
- Re: Reply vs. Reply All for Newsgroups Jerry Baker
- Re: Reply vs. Reply All for Newsgroups Ben Bucksch
- Re: Reply vs. Reply All for Newsgroups Jennifer Glick
- Re: Reply vs. Reply All for Newsgroups Matthew Thomas
- Re: Reply vs. Reply All for Newsgroups Ben Bucksch
- Re: Reply vs. Reply All for Newsgroups Jennifer Glick
- Re: Reply vs. Reply All for Newsgroups Akkana
- Re: Reply vs. Reply All for Newsgroups J.B. Moreno
- Re: Reply vs. Reply All for Newsgroups Ben Bucksch
- Re: Reply vs. Reply All for Newsgroups Ben Ruppel
- Re: Reply vs. Reply All for Newsgroups Jerry Baker
- Re: Reply vs. Reply All for Newsgroups Adam Bailey
- Re: Reply vs. Reply All for Newsgroups Christopher Jahn
