Sebastian Späth wrote:
Ah, it's you :-).
> Ben Bucksch wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> (Sorry for that, I'd love to use my real name, but textfields in
> todays nightly are broken, so I have no possibility to change it today
> :-))
Now, *that*'s a good reason :-).
> Sure, it works perfectly and uses less than 400kb RAM (w/ virt. mem).
> It however depends on the NS4 preferences you specified (which is fine
> for me as I have the same IMAP account for NS4 and Moz)
> Don't know how much work it would need to adapt it to be a
> stand-alone solution.
Not much I'd guess. Anybody from Netscape? Why not just dump the 4.x one
on cvs.mozilla.org? "Take it or leave it."
> Otherwise there are tons of free mail checkers out there.
I know. But some people seem to think, it should come with Mozilla. Are
any of the "free" biffs (which are comfortable) under the MPL or
BSD-license?
> The only reason I use the NS one is that only few do IMAP and none
> uses SSL.
Yup
--
This message is protected by ROT0 encryption and the DMCA.
Reading is disallowed and will be prosecuted.
