John Marmion wrote:
>
> > John Marmion wrote:
> > >
> > > We feel that there was no real conviction to QA this patch despite
> > > the fact that we had made it available as early as the 20th April.
> >
> > Who were you looking for QA from? If you wanted it from mozilla.org, did
> > you co-ordinate with Asa?
>
> Forgive my ignorance but who is Asa?
Asa is Asa Dotzler, [EMAIL PROTECTED], the head QA person (among the many
hats he wears) for mozilla.org. I would have thought he'd be the first
point of contact if QA resource is required.
> The problem is that changing the Address Book in Mozilla
> means that the Commercial Tree and in particular the
> AIM stuff needs to be tested. This testing is outside
> of our control.
Ah. This would be a confusion between mozilla.org and Netscape. It may
well be that the Netscape commercial tree gets spanked when Mozilla
checkins happen. This is something that all Mozilla distributors have to
deal with. But holding up Mozilla checkins because Netscape have not
allocated sufficient resource to keep up with the pace of our development
is, IMO, wrong.
After all, if AIM were in the Mozilla tree, this would be less of a
problem. ;-)
> The real issue now is to ensure it does get it for 0.9.3
Looking at the bug you quoted, it looks like it's going through review
now. If it makes it through that, we either need to think about test
builds or super-review. You should coordinate with [EMAIL PROTECTED] as
to the best route to take.
Gerv
