Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> Warren Bell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Your suggestion was to download extra programs and run them
>> with/instead of(?) mozilla to do what I wanted.
>
> Your claim[1] was that *all* readers except Mozilla display "> > >" out
> of the box which is total nonsense since that depends to a large extent
> on what the other party sends you.
No. That is not my claim. Why don't you get your fact straight before
replying that my posts ar nonsense. Where did I say *all* readers do this?
> The only way to consistently achieve
> a display of either ">>>" or "> > >" are external programs like the ones
> I have mentioned which are easy to use and offer a slew of other helpful
> features. Thus my suggestion is AFAIK the *only* way to achieve what
> you want on *any* reader. But unfortunately you appear to be immune to
> apprehension and learning :-(
>
More insults and inaccurate quoting of what I said, marvelous.
>> I started a new
>> thread because solution wasn't what I wanted to use, I don't like
>> to stack programs just to get one job done.
>
> How is that a reason to start a new thread ?! You don't like the
> answers you get so you start a new thread and file a new bug because
> the old one was closed ? ~:-/
Two different bugs.
>
> Regards
>
> Rolf
>
>
> PS: BTW, please snip irrelevant parts of previous posts. Makes your
> message easier to read. Thank you.
>
> Footnotes:
> ==========
> [1] see http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89954
>
