[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ben Bucksch) writes: > * If the default is "Generate a new key", and users don't > care/understand, we risk that our users flood the world with their > certificates. Sure. But are the consequences really that bad? > We'd end up with lots of certificates for a single user, which > would have the consequence that nobody cares about the > validity anymore, which means that security goes south again. I don't see how security changes just because a lot of people will not employ the tools very securely. We just shouldn't imply that because you sprinkle magic crypto dust on an e-mail, that it is automatically genuine. People still need to use their brain, or they will lose sometimes. -- Robbe
- Re: S/MIME prep work begins! Ben Bucksch
- Re: S/MIME prep work begins! Frank Hecker
- Re: S/MIME prep work begins! Frederick Roeber
- Re: S/MIME prep work begins! Ben Bucksch
- Re: S/MIME prep work begins! Frederick Roeber
- Re: S/MIME prep work begins! Ben Bucksch
- Re: S/MIME prep work begins! Frank Hecker
- Re: S/MIME prep work begins! Ben Bucksch
- Re: S/MIME prep work begins! Ben Bucksch
- Re: S/MIME prep work begins! Robert Bihlmeyer
- Re: S/MIME prep work begins! Michael Str�der
- Re: S/MIME prep work begins! Ben Bucksch
- Re: S/MIME prep work begins! Frederick Roeber
- Re: S/MIME prep work begins! Michael Str�der
- Re: S/MIME prep work begins! Ben Bucksch
- Re: S/MIME prep work begins! Matthew Thomas
- Re: S/MIME prep work begins! Frederick Roeber
- Re: S/MIME prep work begins! Ben Bucksch
- Re: S/MIME prep work begins! Matthew Thomas
- Re: S/MIME prep work begins! Dr S N Henson
