Gordon Burgess-Parker wrote: >> Sebastian Sp�th wrote: >>> AOL/Netscape are simply using proprietary formats for their mail >>> access, > I agree that AOL is crap, but there is a very good reason I have an > account - in the UK I beleive that AOL is the ONLY provider to give > non-British Telecom telephone line users flat rate unmetered internet > acces! (I'm waiting for NTL broadband to be rolled out to where I live > so that will solve it!) Oh, I am not saying that AOL is bad as an ISP (although others may say so), I am just saying that using an e-mail account which can just be used with propriatary tools is crap. But that's offtopic in here and so I'll better shut up now. Spaetz
- Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Gordon Burgess-Parker
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Sebastian Sp�th
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Sebastian Sp�th
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Gordon Burgess-Parker
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Sebastian Sp�th
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Ben Ruppel
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Gordon Burgess-Parker
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Ben Ruppel
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Gordon Burgess-Parker
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Ben Ruppel
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Adam Bailey
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Adam Bailey
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Mark
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Christopher Jahn
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Peter Lairo
