Adam Bailey wrote: > Ben Ruppel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Okay, so you're saying that AOL doesn't provide a standard IMAP or POP >>mail account, correct? > > Correct. > > http://members.aol.com/adamkb/aol/mailfaq/#3rd-party What sorry excuse: 1. AOL is so huge that standard protocols couldn't handle the volume. Is that a valid argument? I doubt it. 2. Support for 3rd party software is too costly. All they would need is to teach their technicians how to install/configure about 3 programs (M$ OE, Netscape and Opera). That would cover 99% of their user base (including those too stupid to not use the AOL software). AOL is just lame. -- Regards, Peter Lairo
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Sebastian Sp�th
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Ben Ruppel
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Gordon Burgess-Parker
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Ben Ruppel
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Gordon Burgess-Parker
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Ben Ruppel
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Adam Bailey
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Adam Bailey
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Mark
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Christopher Jahn
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Peter Lairo
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Adam Bailey
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Adam Bailey
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Ben Bucksch
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Adam Bailey
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Ben Bucksch
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Adam Bailey
- Re: Mozilla and AOL/netscape mail Jay Garcia
