"Holger Metzger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
9o9doc$p56$04$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9o9doc$p56$04$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Asa Dotzler wrote:
>
> > Holger Metzger wrote:
> >
> >> Gervase Markham wrote:
> >>
> >>>>I don't know if there were this question before but can I decode
> >>>>messages with ROT13? And if yes how can I do it?
> >>>>
> >>>I wrote a patch but it was refused. So no.
> >>
> >> This is one of the FAQs on my site and people ask me about it almost
> >> daily - "Why isn't there ROT-13 support?". Whoever refused it should
> >> listen to enduser complaints more. Or is it the same Netscape guy who
> >> deactivated structured words in Netscape 6.x ("Structured words are too
> >> complicated for Netscape 6 users. And btw ROT-13 is too complicated
> >> also, I refuse the patch.")
> >
> > Code should not be rejected from inclusion in Mozilla based on Netscape
> > end user skill set. What patch are you talking about?
>
> I wasn't talking about a specific patch. I was just wondering if this is
> the way they think about Netscape and Mozilla endusers.
You phrased that as if you were talking about a specific instance.
Be careful with your wording, or people will be apt to misunderstand
you.
