Ben Bucksch wrote:
> Actually, cases like the rejecttion of PGP made we wonder, if it is time
> for a larger coverage of this topic.
Especially PGP makes me wonder too, they have an NAI guy providing code
and he is ignored, because "the general architecture for this is still
missing" (AFAIK). It is not everybody having that attitude, so don't be
offended in general, but we tons of good patches rotting which is
extremly annoying for contributors.
I can understand that low-quality patches are being rejected, they can't
take everything in and they shouldn't, but e.g. just ignoring many
patches, not commenting on them etc... is extreeeemly annoying. Many
have been pissed off by this and I can understand why.
Sebastian
