I see your point now. Funny thing is that Communicator always has had problems with table layout.
Jay Garcia wrote: > On 10/21/2001 1:32 PM, T Carr wrote: > > >>Jay Garcia wrote: >> >> >> >>>On 10/21/2001 1:20 PM, T Carr wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>>Jay Garcia wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>On 10/21/2001 1:06 PM, T Carr wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>www.artbell.com is one of my favorite sites. >>>>>> >>>>>>However, if you check Bells web site in IE (any version except 3.x) and >>>>>>Opera, you will see that the navigation bars work. However, they do not >>>>>>work in any iteration of Netscape 6.x or Mozilla. >>>>>> >>>>>>Why is that?? >>>>>> >>>>>>If you look at www.fitnessforlife.com, a site that uses complex layers >>>>>>and script, Netscape handles it just fine. >>>>>> >>>>>>So, why has Netscape continuously stuggled with Bells web site? >>>>>> >>>>>>Tim >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>What doesn't work for YOU ?? All links work here in 2001101909 on >>>>>Win98SE .. WHAT'S NEW, PROGRAM, LIBRARY, etc all work just fine. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>You need to view the Art Bell Site in IE 6.x or Opera. Try mousing over >>>>the left Navigation bar. You get pop up menus. >>>> >>>>In Netscape you get nothing. The mouseovers do not work. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>Yowza .. Yup >>> >>>In Communicator, the table graphics are disjointed but display ok in >>>Mozilla. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>Jay, explain what you are talking about. I am confused. I am not using >>COmmunicator. I have Mozilla 0.9.5 and NS 6.1 >> >>When I go to Bell's site, neither of these browser display his java >>script mousover effects. I am assuming they do not get displayed on your >>version of Mozilla either?? So, what are you referring to when you >>mention Communicator? >> >> >> > > What I am referring to is that Communicator displays the menu properly > but does NOT display the table graphics properly. Mozilla doesn't > display the menu properly but DOES display the table graphics properly. > Just an interesting anomaly. > > >
