You cannot always rely on that Validator. I have to disagree with the use of it to decipher problems relating to page display.
Thse validators often times enforce strict rules that have no affect on hoe a page will display. Look at www.fitnessforlife.com for example. Notice all the errors pertaing to table height and image names and so forth? None of those issues affect the display of the page. Christopher Jahn wrote: > And it came to pass that T Carr wrote: > > >>Jay Garcia wrote: >> >> >>>On 10/21/2001 1:06 PM, T Carr wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>www.artbell.com is one of my favorite sites. >>>> >>>>However, if you check Bells web site in IE (any version >>>>except 3.x) and Opera, you will see that the navigation >>>>bars work. However, they do not work in any iteration of >>>>Netscape 6.x or Mozilla. >>>> >>>>Why is that?? >>>> >>>>If you look at www.fitnessforlife.com, a site that uses >>>>complex layers and script, Netscape handles it just fine. >>>> >>>>So, why has Netscape continuously stuggled with Bells web >>>>site? >>>> >>>>Tim >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>What doesn't work for YOU ?? All links work here in >>>2001101909 on Win98SE .. WHAT'S NEW, PROGRAM, LIBRARY, etc >>>all work just fine. >>> >>> >>> >>You need to view the Art Bell Site in IE 6.x or Opera. Try >>mousing over the left Navigation bar. You get pop up menus. >> >>In Netscape you get nothing. The mouseovers do not work. >> >> > > Bad code, as usual. > > >http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.artbell.com%2F&charset=%28detect+automatically%29&doctype=HTML+4.01+Transitional > >
