Now that is good. A well reasoned explanation. If you have stated this as clearly elsewhere in this thread then smack me. It is my bad. With what you just said I will be looking over my site and see if there are any changes I can make. Bravo!
-- George Hester "DeMoN LaG" <n@a> wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > "George Hester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in > 9rvskk$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9rvskk$[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02 Nov 2001: > > > Poor T Car. He tries to point out a website that works perfectly > > in IE and for which Netscape and Mozilla haven't the foggiest idea > > how to handle. You people have attacked him using an ancient > > validator that would have been thrown in the trashheap by Fred > > Flinstone If anyone needs to get a life it is those that babble > > about how good Netscape or Mozilla are. Get real folks. I > > understand supporting the underdog is good empathy but does nothing > > to change their failures. > > The site doesn't work because it detects Mozilla as a version of > Netscape and thinks it supports document.layers, which it doesn't. The > page should switch from document.layers and document.all to > document.getElementById('foo') and then all browsers would work fine, > and you'd only have one script to keep up to date > > -- > ICQ: N/A (temporarily) > AIM: FlyersR1 9 > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > _ = m
