"George Hester" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in 9rvreb$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:9rvreb$[EMAIL PROTECTED], on 02 Nov 2001:
> No. If X imples Y then NOT X implies NOT Y. That is the fallacy. > Very commonly done and wrong! The accurate result should be NOT Y > implies NOT X. There are others such as is it true that ab = ba ? ab = ba = a * b = b * a I have a cat. I have a dog. You have a cat. Do you have a dog? Just because you have a cat does not mean you have a dog, and just because you don't have a dog doesn't mean you don't have a cat. if X implies Y, NOT X does not necessarily imply NOT Y. -- ICQ: N/A (temporarily) AIM: FlyersR1 9 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ = m
