Katsuhiko Momoi wrote: > I wrote in comments to > > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109342 > > ISO-8859-15 may not be the choice we should be looking at. I suspect > that a lot of people are already using Windows-1252. I am currently > inclined to recommend Unicode (UTF-8) instead. I've provided some > reasons why we should avoid ISo-8859-15 at this point. > UTF-8 might be the easiest choice, but many mail/newsreaders out there might have compatibility problems with it. IMHO Mozilla should only use UTF-8 when it's absolutely necessary, while iso-8859-15 is more compatible and suffices for most (western) european lamguages.
Holger
