In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jay Garcia <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Gratton wrote: -snip- > > While you're at it, if you has used a real address (see also "No > > anonymous messages" in the same section of the same document, above) > > then this wouldn't have had to go to the group/list. -snip- > My REAL mail address is quite well known JayATJayGarcia.com. I will not > use my real address on a non-secure server, plain and simple. I get > enough spam as it is. Regardless of how well know your real address is, you shouldn't be using "domain.nul". Per RFC 2606, you should be using something that ends in the top level domain ".invalid". Perhaps, "<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>". This would allow the newsreader to warn that you couldn't be sent email (and won't cause any problems when "nul" becomes a valid tld). -- J.B Moreno
