Christopher Jahn wrote:
>And it came to pass that Ben Bucksch wrote:
>
>>>If that's your idea of a "solution", then the actual
>>>solution is to use an email client that works properly.
>>>
>>I don't think such comments are helpful. Esp. if you are
>>wrong.
>>
>But I'm hardly EVER wrong.
>
No comment :).
>I'm not wrong now - Mozilla Mail has
>a flaw that needs to be addressed.
>
Fact is that, last time I checked, I found no Windows email client other
than Outlook Express that had (decent) support for multiple POP/IMAP
accounts.
("decent", because either Eudora or Pegasus had a gross hack to support
mutiple POP boxes, and Messenger 4.x can use mutiple profiles.)
So the fact alone that there is a possibility to have multiple
identities (with fake POP accounts, which is not *too* hard to figure
out) is positively outstanding.
>a new approach, and you seem to forget that PEOPLE are going to
>be using this product eventually, and PEOPLE don't want to have
>to outwit their software to make it do what they need.
>
Don't argue with *me*. I was the one who filed the RFE bug to implement
this feature. Netscape decided that it doesn't want it, so it gets no
development resources. Dunno, if they'd accept a patch.
>Note that including the bit about faking the ID in the Help file
>would count as "addressing the problem."
>
Which help file? :-)
>OR you could do what many other clients do
>
Maybe you want to tell us which other email clients are so great? (see
above)
