Travis Crump wrote: > Michael Collette wrote: >> If I did move him over, even KMail has a >> Eudora conversion utility. It's a relatively simple thing to convert, >> and it's the single most popular E-Mail client that is not bundled with >> some other product. >> > Now you are being absurd... How do you think KMail stores attachments: > <http://lists.kde.org/?l=kmail&m=100585482905624&w=2> > And KMail is bundled with KDE so if KMail isn't buddled with some other > product than neither is Outlook, and I can assure you Outlook has a > larger market share than KMail...
I think I jumped off on to too many tangents on my last post. I'll refrain from doing so in the future as best as I can. My apologies for the confusion. To address this one comment, I am aware of how KMail stores it's attachments, as this is presently my primary mail client I use these days. I personally do not receive a large number of attachments, nor do I have AV concerns on my FreeBSD box. The only reason I mentioned it at all was to illustrate the fact that many clients, even on the *nix side of the house, can readily import Eudora data. http://kmail.kde.org/manual/importing.html My concerns largely revolve around those users that I assist that are Windows users, and fall into categories that I personally do not. I've been trying to focus on that aspect, but let myself get side tracked a bit in the midst of the discussion. Later on, -- "Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog, it's too dark to read." - Groucho Marx
