Stuart Ballard wrote:
>>I've looked at that. There may be some stuff there that could help me, >>but I think they've got a different goal... >> > > They have an overlapping goal. I've asked the author of xmlterm about > using it as mozilla's telnet client and it certainly is (or was, at the > time, which was a long time ago) one of his goals. I hope you will work > on making xmlterm fill this role, because it has great potential as > such. > Ok, obviously I need to spend some more time looking at XMLTerm, then. > XMLTerm can operate as a traditional terminal emulator, or it can work > in its fancy XML-mode, or a bit of both. I think a mozilla telnet client > that supports traditional terminal standards would be great, but one > that also took advantage of mozilla's graphical capabilities would be > even better. Think traditional IRC vs Chatzilla, which supports smileys > and hyperlinking, for example (although I don't think chatzilla is > unique among irc clients in offering those capabilities). Ok, that's cool. Sounds like XMLTerm may be more in-line with what I was hoping for, than I realized at first... > I do think the goals can be reconciled, and I think it would be a shame > not to do so. > Indeed. Thanks, Phillip
