On Tue, 02 Jan 2001 09:01:20 -0600, Michael Kaply wrote:
> Here's my question. For Tms Rmn and Helv ONLY, should I convert them to
> Times New Roman and Helvetica respectively so that they can be scaled?
> Or should they not be scaled because they are bitmap fonts.
>
> Note that we are going to default the font to Tms Rmn, so things like
> <H1> and <H2> look smaller than they should because of this.
I used to use TmsRmn before, it looked much better on screen than
TTF/T1 fonts. But I gave up. It changes the look of a page too much
recently (with new designs). Even the TmsRmn 12pt is not Times New
Roman 12pt in size. The question is: if you're going to convert it,
why use TmsRmn as the default in the first place? Just use Times New
Roman and leave the TmsRmn untouched, so OS/2 web authors can use it
at will (as they use WarpSans right now).
Nenad
