We have the fix for this - we are trying to get the NSPR folk to check it in.
And as far as using EMX for the PM build, that really wouldn't be worthwhile.
It can't be debugged, and without optimization, it performs the same.
Incidentally, we have started turning on some optimization in the VACPP build.
There are also bugs in select() on EMX that were/are causing PSM problems as
well.
Mike Kaply
IBM
Ian Harvey wrote:
> But how about using emx for the PM build ?
>
> I used to have a working build environment a long while ago (when there
> was an emx tinderbox), but not anymore.
>
> Configure fails when trying to write the makefiles for nsprpub due to
> the drive specification on the srcdir being incorrectly parsed.
> Switching to the driveless pwd fixes this, but then the build blows up
> in nsprpub with a missing -Zomf spec from the link line.
>
> Trying to work out what's going on in an autoconf based build is not
> fun. If anyone who has the emx build working could review the
> instructions under mozilla.org/ports/os2 for correctness I'd appreciate
> it.
>
> IanH
>
> Henry Sobotka wrote:
> >
> > Ian Harvey wrote:
> > >
> > > Is it still feasible to use emx as the compiler? I can't seem to find
> > > the tinderbox for it anymore.
> >
> > Yes. XWarpzilla is an emx build. The tinderbox disappeared a long time
> > ago.
> >
> > h~
