Ben Bucksch wrote:
> Let's look at the nominations, too. We introduced them to see, what the
> community considers important for a release.
>
> Of course, the nominations only thell half of the stry, since people
> can't say "don't fix this bug and rather ship earlier", but it does give
> an impression. IMO, pushing out a bug with a nomination <= mozilla1.0
> should/must be funded with rationals other then "we are overworked".
> (Since we are trying to define Mozilla 1.0, the logical answer to "We
> are overwroked" would be "Then push out the release".)
another point are the votes for bugs. IMO all the often voted bugs
should be fixed, say all bugs with >= 5 votes, which is currently a list
of 309 bugs (of which some are tracking bugs):
http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&votes=5
Regards,
Niko!
--
e-mail
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web
: - http://www.pavlicek.de: private HP
- http://www.html-online.de: Einf�hrung in HTML
- http://www.los-angeles2019.de: Blade Runner Fanpage
----------------------------------------------------------------
