In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Josh Soref
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Evangelism.
> the following is my off the cuff opinion and should have no weight in the
> discussion: Ideally top100 sites should not have open severity:critical
> evang bugs.
OTOH, the lack of Mozilla 1.0 encumbers evang. Some people have an
attitude that they won't fix their site for a browser that is in eternal
beta and they only care about released browsers. I have been faced with
that attitude--and the site was even a site for another open-source
project.
> What about print preview? It wasn't a stop ship for ns6.0, but i think it
> might be for mozilla1.0
Parity with Mac IE (without its bugs :-) would be extremely cool.
However, that's probably not a realistic requirement.
> Composer.
Would be good if Composer created Standards mode pages and not Quirks
mode pages.
I'd consider fixing the line break / paragraph break behavior a 1.0
requirement.
> We don't support frames,
Frames are deprecated and user-unfriendly. Not supporting them is, IMO,
not at all a bad thing.
> -asxml to convert html to wellformed xml
Not very useful without editing support for other XML-based stuff like
Ruby or MathML.
--
Henri Sivonen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.clinet.fi/~henris/
