jon, I agree with out 100%, but I do not think that freezing some 
fundemental APIs prevents us from decoupling later.

Jon Smirl wrote:

> Another issue for me is modularity of XPCOM.
> http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66759
> 
> Could XPCOM be reworked so that XPCOM Standalone is what Mozilla uses? The
> main linkage seems to be with INTL code. Should this dependency be moved out
> of XPCOM and put somewhere else? If XPCOM brings in INTL, INTL brings in
> everything else, and you have to ship the browser just to get to XPCOM.
> Maybe the right answer of this is to bring a small piece of INTL into XPCOM.
> 
> --
> 
> Jon Smirl
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to