Jon Smirl wrote: > Another issue for me is modularity of XPCOM. > http://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66759 > > Could XPCOM be reworked so that XPCOM Standalone is what Mozilla uses? I think that XPCOM standalone needs to be the only build mode, yes. scc and brendan and I have discussed this before; it requires the string conversion stuff to be moved out of string/, but I think that's been scc's plan for a while. The netwerk silliness in the file code has to go too, but then I think we're pretty much done. Mike
- Re: Freezing Embedding Interfaces... Doug Turner
- Re: Freezing Embedding Interfaces... Jon Smirl
- Re: Freezing Embedding Interfaces... Chris Seawood
- Re: Freezing Embedding Interfaces... Christopher Blizzard
- Re: Freezing Embedding Interfaces... Rick Potts
- Re: Freezing Embedding Interfaces... Doug Turner
- Re: Freezing Embedding Interfaces... Dan Mosedale
- Re: Freezing Embedding Interfaces... Doug Turner
- Re: Freezing Embedding Interfaces... Mike Shaver
- Re: Freezing Embedding Interfaces... Doug Turner
- Re: Freezing Embedding Interfaces... Mike Shaver
- Re: Freezing Embedding Interfaces... Mike Shaver
- Re: Freezing Embedding Interfaces... Chris Seawood
- Re: Freezing Embedding Interfaces... Adam Lock
- Re: Freezing Embedding Interfaces... Rick Potts
- Re: Freezing Embedding Interfaces... Wan-Teh Chang
- Re: Freezing Embedding Interfaces... Sean Echevarria
- Re: Freezing Embedding Interfaces... Doug Turner
