i think that that's what dougt means when he says 'freeze' w.r.t. concrete classes.  

we need to take a snapshot of the implemenations and place them in a static library that embeddors (and other 3rd party developers) can link into *their* code..

-- rick.

Adam Lock wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
Doug Turner wrote:
I am pushing to freeze the core parts of XPCOM.  The reason is simple,
changes are busting users of xpcom clients. There needs to be a
definitive list of the frozen API which embedders and xpcom developers
can reference.

Doug

I think nsCOMPtr and the other non-trivial classes (e.g. strings) should
be made totally inline or pushed off into a static lib so that we
*don't* have freeze them.




Reply via email to