................................. To leave Commie, hyper to http://commie.oy.com/commie_leaving.html .................................
>Dunno if my apparatus is a bit on the old side (1 GHz w 64MB of RAM) Ooops! With "old" I meant "lower-than-200 MHz and less-than-64 MB"... >I think in my case >it's not about memory at all, rather about BAD programming. Butbutbut... you can't do any system-level stuff with Flash. The only thing you _can_ do is fill the memory and/or slow down the machine. As far as I know... ... which reminds me: anyone knowing how that Flash virus worked? The whole existence of that kind of virus is a big mystery to me: You can't write on client's hard disk with Flash. Is there a security hole or something? > It's kinda >funny (or the opposite, actually) that all the products tend to be buggy- >as-hell is they're from a company that has a name with a "-soft" -suffix. >(mikro$oft, makro$oft, nullsoft etc.) Microsoft: I agree. Macromedia: No problems, so far. Nullsoft: Dunno. Only minor problems so far. When it comes to usability, Winamp still is the best mp3 player choice on Wintel-side. Or are there any thinkable alternatives? I hated the user interfaces in Sonique, K-j�fol and XMPlay. > > Annnnyway, regardless of the operating system, the main annoyance in Flash > > stuff still is the usability. Very rarely you see justified usage of > Flash, > > and even if you do, the interface sucks. > >Very true indeed. But then again, I see a lot more unnecessary javascript >action >than flash, but flash is bound to spread out a lot in a year or so. Bad >thing, that. Because I get the butter on my bread for doing Flash stuff, I really can't give any objective comments on this... ;) I've been bought by Macromedia! ---> jab | commie | http://commie.oy.com "Less is moo" -- The Holy Mad Cow
