In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you wrote:
>> > the best way (i believe) to make information useful is
>> > graphically. would a simple XWindow window do the trick ?
>> gfx would be nice, and I think ability to compare 2 different bitstreams
>> would be nice too, frame by frame, and a filterfunction to chose out the
>> data you want to look at..
> right, right...
>> Its very useful when finding out where/why the soundquality and the
>> bitstream changes from diffrent encoders, or when making changes in the
>> encoder and want to know "what happens".
>> (If someone should have time to code one.. I neither have time or any
>> experience/knowledge in programming X.. :/ )
> Sorry i am not in that business now...
> but XWindow is not THAT complex.
> i did some little stuffs with it...
> so if you need, i can help you (up to what i know)
> WHYGEE
Hi,
Why make this harder than it really is?
One could use qt or gtk to make the analyzer...
Then X is not that hard. Xlib will have you watching too much on details.,
Furthermore, using a toolkit will make sure the app has a usable interface.
But the idea could be usefull anyway.
Additional idea.
We @8hz could make available a number of short mp3's to be evaluated and voted
on, so we know which version of our encoder produces the best quality.
Because music is pretty subjective and a numerical analasys helps, but
does not say it all IMHO.
What are your opinions on this.
goran(@8hz.com)
