On Mon, 2 Nov 1998, James "Jasha" Droppo wrote:
> Yes, "dodgy" is a good adjective for what you have done. As a result
> of ignoring Nyquist's sampling theorem, the new code wraps (aliases)
> frequency content originally at 34 to 44 kHz down to 34 to 24
Ahh. That sounds sort of familiar. All I know of sampling theory I got
from looking over the shoulder of a housemate in 1992 who was studying
electrical engineering :)
It was only meant to be a quick hack anyway, and I'm glad someone has the
expertise to do it properly.
> kHz. What is needed is an anti-aliasing filter. I'll see what I can do
> and mail you the results later on today.
Just had a quick look at sox's resampling routines. Lots of stuff I don't
understand in there :)
> James 'Jasha' Garnet Droppo III [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Washington
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
should have known :)
later
mike
