Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Future Directions

[Alfred Weyers]

> I would agree that we should keep LAME as single purpose as possible,
> but Conrad's id3 patch was clean and unobtrusive, and adds some
> features somewhat related to encoding.

I support this point of view. Keep things simple.
I think most efforts should go into things lame is supposed to be good at
- encoding Layer 3 files and teach us how to do audio coding
for further (independent) improvement ;). 



--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )