>
> Hi!
>
> Due to really fast development of LAME since version 3.21 I lost the
> track of the new command line options. Would anybody (Mark :) like
> to summarize these changes? Another interesting thing is the best
> command line for best-quality encoding. I got confused a little bit
> because several different sources tell that LAME performs better in
> sense of quality if it is running without its native psycho-model.
>
> So, what would be the best command line for CBR encoding at 128,
> 160, 192 and 256 kbps? What's about VBR quality over different
> command line parameters? Asking these questions I consider the
> latest available beta version - 3.56.
>
> ---
> Sergey A. Maslyakov
> 2:5030/1024@fidonet
>
>
VBR is making steady progress, but still needs work :-)
My recommendations, just: lame -h
Mark
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
