Hi Holger,
Thanks for pointing that out. The parameters used can be considered the
default settings <if I could say that> for the respective encoders. However,
if we were to compare them with respect to sound properties, the command
line parameters for LAME would then be:
lame -h -k -m s
In addition to the '-m s' parameter you suggested, I added the '-k' option
in the new timings. As Mark stated, "Blade does not impose a 16kHz cutoff.
The 16kHz cuttoff in LAME is only used at 128kbs. At higher bitrates it is
not used, and you can always disable the cutoff at low bitrates with '-k'."
So, here we go:
Encoder Timing Size
-----------------------------------------------
LAME 3.51 70 sec 4,872,440 Bytes
LAME 3.57beta 64 sec 4,872,022 Bytes
Regards,
Ethan
----- Original Message -----
From: Holger Dors <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Ethan Yeo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 26, 1999 4:17 AM
Subject: Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Updated LAME Benchmark Timings
> Hello Ethan,
>
> > Command Line Parameters:
> > BladeEnc - bladeenc track1.wav track1.mp3
> > LAME - lame -h track1.wav track1.mp3
>
> You're aware that with those parameters you're comparing a stereo
> encoding process against a joint-stereo one? I'm no expert, but I'd
> expect that the creation of joint-stereo would have some effect on the
> time needed... What's the result if you use lame with
> "lame -h -m s track1.wav track1.mp3"?
>
> Best regards,
> Holger mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
> --
> MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
