> The midpoint (in terms of the error) is: .5 * (1 + 2.52) = 1.76. > So if x<1.76, we should take i=1 and if x>1.76 we take i=2. I think that for this kind of test, something like: i=(int)(x^.75+.5) would be faster than a comparison, and produces the same output. Btw do you have any explanation about how .4054 could be optimal for any value? Regards, Gabriel Bouvigne - France [EMAIL PROTECTED] icq: 12138873 MP3' Tech: www.mp3tech.org -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Gabriel Bouvigne
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Mathew Hendry
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Takehiro Tominaga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Greg Maxwell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Greg Maxwell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Greg Maxwell
