> Segher, shouldn't the formula be: > > > if (x > (0.5 * (pow(i, 4.0/3.0) + pow(i+1, 4.0/3.0)) > > i++; > > > Mark No, if you use 4/3, you optimize for sample amplitude; but we'd like the sample _energy_ to be optimal, so 8/3. Ciao, Segher -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Gabriel Bouvigne
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Mathew Hendry
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Segher Boessenkool
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Takehiro Tominaga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Greg Maxwell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Greg Maxwell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Greg Maxwell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Greg Maxwell
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] quantization formula Takehiro Tominaga
