On Mon, 13 Dec 1999, Mark Taylor wrote:
> I dont think we should make this change. Preserving the amplitude
> (and thus the actual shape of the wave form) seems more important than
> the energy. Also, using fabs(i^8/3 -x^2) is an unusual definition of
> noise that I have never seen in any of the technical papers.
> > with my poor listening test, I think we should take noise calculation
> > >> fabs(i^8/3 - x^2)
> > instead of
> > >> ( i^4/3 -x ) ^2
He's saying that it sounds better with listening tests.
I think that because of that, it should be given a more in-depth look then
"I've never seen anything in the lit do that".
Can someone who's implimented these changes please produce some test
samples?
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
