Thanks for the info Robert.

Am I right in thinking -X0 is the default?

Is there anyone testing the different -X settings on different music types.
Maybe the results of tests should be published somewhere for comparison?
John Hayward-Warburton has mentioned his preferences with -X4 & 5 in choral
music.  Maybe you could try the new -X6 option John.

Ross.

Robert Hegemann wrote:
> > What does the -X parameter do exactly?
> 
> When LAME searches for a "good" quantization, it has to compare
> the actual one with the best one found so far. 
> The function quant_compare says which one is better, the best
> so far or the actual. 
> Now the -X parameter selects between different approaches to 
> make this decision:
> 
> -X0   the actual is better 
>       if it has less distorted scalefactor bands,
>       or if it's equal to the best so far 
>          and the sum of noise over the thresholds is less 
>              than the best so far
> 
> -X1   the actual is better
>       if the maximum noise over all scalefactor bands is less
>          than the best so far
> 
> -X2   the actual is better
>       if the total sum of noise is lower than the best so far
> 
> -X3   the actual is better
>       if the total sum of noise is lower than the best so far 
>       and the maximum noise over all scalefactor bands
>           is less than the best so far plus 2db.
> 
> -X4   this is a bit complicated, I think Greg Maxwell should 
>       explain this ;)
> 
> -X5   the actual is better
>       if the sum of noise over the thresholds is less 
>          than the best so far
>       or if they are equal 
>           and the total sum of noise is lower than the best so far
> 
> -X6   the actual is better
>       if the sum of noise over the thresholds is less
>          than the best so far
>       or if they are equal
>          and if the maximum noise over all scalefactor bands is less
>                 than the best so far
>              or if they are equal
>                 and the total sum of noise is less or equal
>                 the best so far
> 
> All these are EXPERIMENTAL and may disappear sooner or later.
> Maybe we find the one and only criterion someday.
> 
> I hope it's getting a bit clearer to you. For the details take a look
> at quantice.c, search for experimentalX.
> 
> 
> Robert
> 
> PS: -X6 is new, I just checked it in
> --
> MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
> 
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )

Reply via email to