> a frequency resolution of only 22050/576 = 38Hz. So the accuracy of the first > few coefficients is questionable, and a highpass filter at 50Hz would > only effect the first 2 MDCT coefficients. I dont know how big a problem > this is, but a true 50Hz filter would need to be done before > calling lame, using a much larger fft/mdct window. No practical filter, digital included, will have a cutoff that sharp. It *could*, but that causes all sorts of other problems (like serious ringing throughout the spectrum). Monty -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- [MP3 ENCODER] filter options Robert Hegemann
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] filter options Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] filter options Robert Hegemann
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] filter options (and ... John Hayward-Warburton
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] filter options (... Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] filter opti... Monty
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] filter ... Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] fil... Monty
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] filter options Ross Levis
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] filter options Robert Hegemann
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] filter options DeRobertis
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] filter options Ross Levis
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] filter options Ross Levis
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] filter options Ross Levis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] filter options John Hayward-Warburton
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] filter options Robert Hegemann
