On Sat, Dec 18, 1999 at 02:19:29PM +0100, Gabriel Bouvigne ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote
> > > It's right that it's not a lot, but I think it's important. As an
> > > example, a standard 10 or 15Hz high pass filter would be nice, as no
> > > one is able to ear such frequencies, so why encoding them?
> >
> > A 10kHz filter, IMHO, would be a bad idea. Even in poor listening
> > conditions with less than adequate equipment this is noticable. It
> > will make most music have a more muddy and boomy sound.
>
> I was speaking about a 15Hz HIGH-PASS filter, and not about any LOW-PASS
> filter.
<sigh> I'll remember to read more closely. I read a "k" in between
the "10" and "Hz".....
Sorry,
John
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
