Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] VBR-speed

[Dmitry]

Hello Robert,

Friday, January 21, 2000, 2:09:55 AM, you wrote:

>> oops, sorry. it was my small but stupid mistake and now lame3.61 is not
>> twice slower 3.60.

RH> what kind of mistake was it?

code was optimized for minimum size... 8"( . sorry.

P.S. so it is not necessary to reencode mp3

Best regards,
 Dmitry                            mail to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )