On Wed, 2 Feb 2000, Ross Levis wrote:

> But as Gabriel Bouvigne argued, you are limiting best quality to the lowest
> number available -- 0.  What do you do if a better quality mode is created?
> Go negative? :)

Shift them all up. Newer lames will be a bit slower for people not taking
the best quality. They will find they can use a lower quality without
losing quality. :)

--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )

Reply via email to