Hi Takehiro.
I still get assertion failures at this point.
Takehiro Tominaga schrieb am Die, 28 M�r 2000:
> Hi, Robert.
>
> This "cod_info.count1 += 2" is necessary to reduce the code size,
> but we can't reduce the code size when cod_info.count1 == 576.
>
> this is fixed before you check in the "assert".
> and I think it is OK now...
Sorry, but it is not OK now. If you check count1 == 576 before this,
what happens if count1 == 575?
575+2=577 --> index overflow --> crash/assertion failure!
So I assume, you have to check count1 >= 575 before.
> ---
> Takehiro TOMINAGA // may the source be with you!
>
> >>>>> "R" == Robert Hegemann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> R> I checked the 3.67 tarball from sulaco.org and it seems to
> R> work. For the SEGFAULT problem with Takehiro's enhanced code I
> R> inserted an assert(i<=576) in best_huffman_divide, and now it
> R> stops with an assertion failure instead of a segmentation
> R> fault.
>
> --
> MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
Robert
--
http://linux.unixcity.de/catwalk/index.html
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
