Oops... At 09:13 AM 4/10/00 -0400, Greg wrote: >On some samples with mp3, 320k is not transparent to such listeners on any >sound equipment What about a mono MP3 sample at 320kBit/sec (vs a mono PCM sample at 705.6kBit/sec)? I guess that defeats the purpose of MP3, but it would be interesting to try... Shawn -- MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to ... Shawn Riley
- [MP3 ENCODER] To Shawn Riley Zia Mazhar
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] To Shawn Ril... Shawn Riley
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] To Shawn Ril... bill
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] To Shawn Ril... Zia Mazhar
- [MP3 ENCODER] 3.80 VBR observa... Ross Levis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.80 VBR obs... Robert Hegemann
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.80 VBR obs... Ross Levis
- Re[2]: [MP3 ENCODER] 3.80 VBR ... Dmitry
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to ... Scott Manley
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to next(v4.00?) Shawn Riley
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to next(v4.00?) Mark Stephens
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to next(v4.00?) Mark Taylor
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Speeding up window_subband Takehiro Tominaga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Speeding up window_subband Naoki Shibata
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Speeding up window_subband Takehiro Tominaga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Speeding up window_subban... Naoki Shibata
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] Speeding up window_su... Takehiro Tominaga
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to next(v4.00?) Bruce Janson
- RE: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to next(v4.00?) Ross Levis
- Re: [MP3 ENCODER] the road to next(v4.00?) Jaroslav Lukesh
