I was using the "Russian" WIN32 compile which was given an alpha revision of "k",
compiled 14 April.
Ross.
Robert Hegemann wrote:
> Hi Ross,
>
> as LAME 3.80 is the CVS version, may I ask you:
> which version of LAME 3.80 did you compare with LAME 3.70?
>
> Robert
>
> Ross Levis schrieb am Sam, 15 Apr 2000:
> > If anyone is interested,VBR is now more spread over the bitrates. Here is a
>partial frame analysis of a song (all encoded with -h -mj ). I included -V3 analysis
>to obtain a closer average
> > bitrate. Some -V tuning is obviously needed. I guess the better lossless
>compression is having an effect.
> >
> > v3.70: (-V4)
> > 64 - 1 - 0.0%
> > 80 - 76 - 0.6%
> > 96 - 1106 - 9.0%
> > 112 - 5943 - 48.6%
> > 128 - 3348 - 27.4%
> > 160 - 982 - 8.0%
> > 192 - 489 - 4.0%
> > 224 - 191 - 1.6%
> > 256 - 76 - 0.6%
> > 320 - 10 - 0.1%
> > Average bitrate: 124.6
> >
> > v3.80: (-V3)
> > 64 - 18 - 0.1%
> > 80 - 343 - 2.8%
> > 96 - 2821 - 23.1%
> > 112 - 2858 - 23.4%
> > 128 - 2587 - 21.2%
> > 160 - 2570 - 21.0%
> > 192 - 634 - 5.2%
> > 224 - 242 - 2.0%
> > 256 - 106 - 0.9%
> > 320 - 42 - 0.3%
> > Average bitrate: 129.1
> >
> > v3.80: (-V4)
> > 64 - 58 - 0.5%
> > 80 - 1771 - 14.5%
> > 96 - 3709 - 30.3%
> > 112 - 2859 - 23.4%
> > 128 - 2075 - 17.0%
> > 160 - 883 - 7.2%
> > 192 - 557 - 4.6%
> > 224 - 174 - 1.4%
> > 256 - 89 - 0.7%
> > 320 - 35 - 0.3%
> > Average bitrate: 115.3
> >
> > Ross.
> >
> >
> > --
> > MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
> --
>
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> homepage: http://linux.unixcity.de/catwalk/index.html
> --
> MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )
